From ccbc77c2d3fa348d0de6f32fc540468401e6880b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zinc Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 16:50:41 +0330 Subject: lexer: a block comment that is never closed is 'unterminated comment' (appendix b.2.11) --- tests/conformance/known.txt | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tests/conformance/known.txt') diff --git a/tests/conformance/known.txt b/tests/conformance/known.txt index 8550c07..f666106 100644 --- a/tests/conformance/known.txt +++ b/tests/conformance/known.txt @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ 4-statements/o3_outside_function_ordinary_block.zc zy c top-level o3 { } is rejected; spec 4.10.2 says it is an ordinary block 5-declarations/fn_prototype_unnamed_params_b13.zc zy c spec 5.2.1 says prototype parameter names are required, and a type name alone is read as an untyped parameter of that name (paramstart); b.2.13 is a spec choice, not fixed 9-appendix-b/b2_10_recovery_hides_errors.zc zy c appendix b.2.10 confirmed; by design per 8.2 -9-appendix-b/b2_11_unterminated_comment.zc zy c appendix b.2.11 confirmed, but spec 1.2.2 says an unclosed block comment is not an error 9-appendix-b/b2_12_as_int_star.zc zy c appendix b.2.12 confirmed, but spec 3.2.3 documents it (parenthesise) 9-appendix-b/b2_14_len_char_ptr_typecheck_off.zc zy c appendix b.2.14 confirmed, but spec 3.13.5 leaves it unspecified 9-appendix-b/b2_15_duplicate_case.zc zy c appendix b.2.15 confirmed; 4.7.2 says duplicates are allowed -- cgit v1.2.3